Over the past few days we've received a number of visits from the good folks at the Columbus Dispatch, who have spent some time riffling through our past blog posts. This was true yet again today. Perhaps their doing opposition research for their good friends at the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR), so Ahmad Al-Akhras doesn't have to anymore while sitting at his cushy government MORPC job?If so, they are no doubt looking for the smoking gun that will prove once and for all that I'm some crypto-bigot, because I say such unkind things about their friends at CAIR, who have assured Mike Curtin that they are peaceful and moderate and really don't support Islamic terrorism (except, of course, when they get caught red-handed speculating on the activity of the "Jewish lobby" in town or saying that Palestinian terrorists are "guerrilla groups").
Or maybe it's just that the Dispatch just holds a grudge against me and they want to do another hit piece for their pain. After all, they cleared Hilliard-based terror cleric Salah Sultan in May 2006, only to have him flee the country following my series of FrontPage Magazine reports over the past year that revealed his appearances at overseas rallies praising HAMAS and doing political analysis for the Muslim Brotherhood. My FrontPage report led to Sultan's US citizenship application getting tossed. Ouch! That had to hurt, especially for Dispatch reporter Felix Hoover who "cleared" Sultan. And then there was the LA Times article back in July which disclosed that Sultan was "glorifying holy war" and stirring up Sunni-Shi'a strife in Bahrain. Double ouch! I know what Felix Hoover is thinking: "But he told me he signed a fatwa condeming terrorism?" And then to have me publish pictures of Sultan cavorting with global terror cleric Yousef Al-Qaradawi at a conference in Qatar just a few weeks ago (wait until they see the video!). You wonder how they gather the courage to go to work every morning to do Mike Curtin's bidding.
So here's an open-ended question for the Dispatch: what exactly is it that you want to know? You know how to get ahold of me. Don't be afraid to ask. I won't bite. Promise.
UPDATE (09/06/07): It seems the Dispatch's curiousity for yours truly is growing, as we had visitors from there again today. Do you people have anything better to do? I don't update this blog nearly enough for it to be that interesting.
UPDATE #2 (09/10/07): OK, this is getting a little weird, guys. I really don't update this blog enough to warrant this much attention from the folks at the Dispatch. Haven't you all downloaded all the previous posts already?
2 comments:
Rejoice that the Dispatch is checking the blog. I think Glenn Sheller is at least beginning to understand the conundrum (i.e., the potential of jihadists arising from among the peaceful), assuming he wrote Sunday's lead editorial.
If only Barbara Carman would learn the Hamas is a terrorist organization and that Hamas supporters are therefore supporting a terrorist organization, whatever their personal, peaceful inclinations may be.
Perhaps if certain individuals from the "Columbus Disgrace" would nail Mikey Coleman to the cross instead of taking any or all threats from his front man CAIR's Ahmad Al-Akhras, the citizens of Central Ohio might take them as a more credible news source.
This would be the same Mikey Coleman who sold out his true brothers & sisters for Islamofacist cash, yes he sold out those who brought him to the dance. Perhaps Al Akhras would care to update his travel plans in advance to the completion of Holy Land Funding trial and it's verdict?
There was no press coverage of the Sunday September 9th, 2007 Islamic Foundation of Columbus dinner which included an appearance from Siraj Wahhaj an unindicted co-conspirator of the 1993 WTC attacks, who was also a character witness for the "Blind Sheik" who is serving time for those attacks.
Instead of Barbara Carmen attempting to pass herself off as Nancy Pelosi (w/her hear covered as the subservient little woman) and if Glenn would've taken this situation far more seriously instead of giving CAIR all of the past free press the situation wouldn't be what it is today.
Post a Comment