Saturday, April 29, 2006

Hezbollah, Illegal Immigration and the Next 9/11

Be sure to check out the article I co-authored with Army LTC Joe Myers that was published yesterday by FrontPage Magazine, Hezbollah, Illegal Immigration and the Next 9/11. The article was also picked up by JihadWatch. I'm considering republishing it here as a PDF document with footnotes, etc. for citation purposes. Honestly, this is a critical issue in the present discussion in Congress about illegal immigration and border security. As we note in the article, the most recent National Security Strategy never mentions border security of the United States, but does discuss border security in other countries. We shouldn't kid ourselves; it is more than likely that the next 9/11 (which is inevitable, according to FBI Director Louis Freeh) is going to come from across our border. It's time for America and our politicians to wake up!

Update (05/02/06): James Lewis at The American Thinker comments on our FPM article and offers his own insights, Hezbollah from Sea to Shining Sea.

Thursday, April 27, 2006

Reflections on the American National Spirit

I was recently reading an article by Victor Davis Hanson, Has Ahmadinejad Miscalculated?, regarding the ongoing pot-banging by the Iranian ayatollahs’ current political stooge, Iranian President Ahmadinejad. We offer our congratulations to the Iranians for their recent nuclear achievements. We’re glad that you’ve joined the 20th Century now that we are in the 21st, and that you’ve been able to replicate the accomplishments of an American generation that has largely passed into history. We must note, however, that you were only able to reach this goal by using American methods and using our own technology. At best, the rest of the world can only imitate America.

I’ve always appreciated Hanson’s understanding of ancient and modern warfare. But what struck me was something he said towards the end of the piece. He wrote:
Ever since September 11, the subtext of this war could be summed up as something like, “Suburban Jason, with his iPod, godlessness, and earring, loves to live too much to die, while Ali, raised as the 11th son of an impoverished but devout street-sweeper in Damascus, loves death too much to live.” The Iranians, like bin Laden, promulgate this mythical antithesis, which, like all caricatures, has elements of truth in it. But what the Iranians, like the al Qaedists, do not fully fathom, is that Jason, upon concluding that he would lose not only his iPod and earring, but his entire family and suburb as well, is capable of conjuring up things far more frightening than anything in the 8th-century brain of Mr. Ahmadinejad. Unfortunately, the barbarity of the nightmares at Antietam, Verdun, Dresden, and Hiroshima prove that well enough.
In these few sentences Hanson captures the essence of the American national ethos. Americans are by nature decadent, rebellious, brash and reckless – we always have been. But history has recorded time and again that when America has been threatened and attacked, from the deepest recesses of the American heartland rises a fierce response prepared to let slip the dogs of war to hound its enemies into submission or oblivion.

This national spirit is something we need to remind ourselves of occasionally; and quite honestly, it is something we have tucked away like an old nostalgic remembrance that we only bring out on flag-waving occasions, like during the Gulf War or after the 9/11 attacks. We live in a troubled time when patriotism is mocked more than celebrated; vices are indulged and virtues are forgotten; heroism and sacrifice replaced with self-interest and inaction. That notwithstanding, the national ethos that Hanson identifies still is in the lifeblood pumped by the heart of America. It is woven into the very fabric of American life itself; it is in our civic institutions; it is in our politics; it resides in its people. The fire of the American spirit can be doused, but never extinguished.

The sense of steely determination in the face of terrible odds and fierce enemies has been in the American bloodline since the beginning. In the dark days when General George Washington and his men were struggling for survival at Valley Forge, Thomas Paine would write these stirring words of encouragement in The Crisis:
These are the times that try men’s souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated. Britain, with an army to enforce her tyranny, has declared that she has a right (not only to TAX) but "to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER" and if being bound in that manner, is not slavery, then is there not such a thing as slavery upon earth. Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God.
These are indeed the times that try men’s souls. Our faith in America’s founding spirit is waning. Critics from all sides express their doubts in loud, whining tones and wring their hands in self-imposed grief at the present state of affairs, all while America’s men and women in uniform live day-to-day in harm’s way in the furthest reaches of the globe to extend freedom to peoples who not long ago were (and some who still are) our enemies. These critics are the summertime soldiers and the sunshine patriots of our day.

Yet it is the weary and wounded men at arms in the dank muck of Valley Forge fighting for their lives from disease and the cold that would gamble America’s future on crossing the icy Delaware just days after Paine’s words were published and capture the Hessian garrison at Trenton, reversing the trend of constant defeat and forced retreat for the embattled colonial troops. George Washington, the Father of our Country, understood the value of risking all to take the battle to our enemies. In the years that followed, America’s hard-won victories and tragic defeats that followed in the War for Independence would eventually win our nation’s freedom. And when the final victory at Yorktown was secured, no one begrudged the summertime soldiers and sunshine patriots from celebrating as well. Even so, few could name any of those colonial naysayers today. America loves the winner.

It isn’t unusual for Americans to lose their way, though Providence has a way of forcing events upon us to remind us of who we are as Americans. These events are the adrenaline that gets the heart pumping our lifeblood to the body politic once again.

As I’ve thought about Hanson’s essay over the past few weeks I have been reminded of two historical incidents (though there are many to choose from) that I think captures the two-sided nature of the American national spirit.

The date of the first event is September 13, 1814. It is an event that we commemorate every time that we sing our national anthem. However, many Americans forget the circumstances surrounding the British assault on Fort McHenry in the misnamed War of 1812. Just weeks before the attack on Baltimore, the British had sailed up the Potomac and put Washington D.C. to the torch, forcing President James Madison and his Cabinet to flee for their lives. The burning of Washington in August 1814 was a demonstration of British military power intended to show America’s impotency. The British quickly sailed back down to Chesapeake Bay to capture the strategic port of Baltimore to issue the coup de grace and bring America to its knees and back under the dominion of the British crown.

This is the plan that America’s enemies had in mind.

But the British miscalculated. They didn’t underestimate the number of men or firepower of the American troops huddled inside Fort McHenry; it was the spirit and resolve of the American forces that the British misjudged.

The British landed a large force at North Point and advanced within sight of the city of Baltimore. The British command intended to sail their fleet up to Fort McHenry and literally pull out their big guns and pound the American forces into submission and surrender and press in to take the rest of the town. On the morning of September 13, 1814, the British Navy began the most intense bombardment ever unleashed in the history of human warfare up to that time against the huddled defenders of Fort McHenry – a bombardment that would continue through the day and well into the night.

Francis Scott Key was an accidental observer to these events. He and a friend had approached the British under a flag of truce to secure the release of an elderly doctor that had been captured and accused of giving aid to some British deserters. As they negotiated with British officials for their friend’s release they became privy to the battle plans of the British and were held onboard one of the ships as a precaution until the British had secured their victory. Even though Key would only observe the bombardment from a ship distant from the battle, the rockets, bombs and flares of the ferocious attack on the American defenders could clearly be seen from miles away.

Using their superior long-range cannons, the British fleet attacked Fort McHenry beyond the range of the American guns. The only American weapon was courage and resolve as the massive bombardment continued. When the shelling stopped at 1 a.m., the dark prevented any view of the American battlement. Key and the other American observers down river would have to wait until morning to see who had won the victory. Those hours of waiting must have tried their souls. They surely must have thought that the awesome firepower of the British fleet had prevailed against the outmanned and outgunned Americans. But the darkness held out the possibility of hope. Maybe the men at Fort McHenry had been able to withstand the British fury.

When dawn finally came, what a sight Francis Scott Key would see: the Americans inside Fort McHenry had taken down their standard storm flag and raised a new massive flag in its place, telling the world of the American ability to withstand the mightiest blow that its enemies could strike and that England’s best was still not enough to prevail. Even though the British had just burned our public buildings in Washington to the ground, the commander at Fort McHenry had the larger flag prepared in anticipation of an American victory. This sign of the triumph of the American spirit was Key's inspiration as he sat down to pen those immortal words familiar to every American heart.

Raising that flag – that Star-Spangled Banner we can still see today at the Smithsonian Museum – was a haughty gesture, but one completely in line with the American national spirit. It was General Patton pissing in the Rhine as he and the crusading American forces were storming into Germany on the verge of crushing our Axis enemies. On that day in Baltimore Harbor, America had taken the most savage beating ever unleashed in the history of warfare from the greatest military power in the world – and won. How utterly American.

We should remember that at the time of the siege of Fort McHenry, the British had Napoleon imprisoned on Elba, and that a year later after his escape they would finally vanquish Bonaparte at Waterloo. The great Napoleon was defeated; America was victorious. American courage and resolve alone had won the victory that brave day on the Chesapeake. This is what our national anthem means when we sing, “O say can you see by the dawn’s early light…”.

Yet it means even more than that. When we sing that immortal refrain, “O say does that Star Spangled Banner yet wave o’er the land of the free and the home of the brave,” we should remember what that Key’s question is rhetorical: he urges us to recall that, yes, the flag still waves and Americans remain free and brave. It means you can burn down our Capitol and White House and send our elected officials fleeing, but the American spirit will allow us to take your best shot and overcome. As long as Americans remain on the field of battle, the American spirit will remain. Through the darkness we remember, just like Francis Scott Key, that hope remains for America, because our most potent weapon has always been Americans themselves.

I think it’s for this reason that Americans love a good fight. Raising the Star-Spangled Banner that day recalled the spirit of Leonidas and the Spartans at Thermopylae responding to the Persian King Xerxes demands to lay down their arms, telling the innumerable Persian foe that faced them, “Come and get them!” Americans have been known to scour the world looking to join the other’s fights when we didn’t have our own to occupy us. We think of Davy Crockett and his Tennessee Volunteers arriving at the Alamo spoiling for a fight. And when all looked hopeless, Crockett, the Volunteers and the rest of the men of the Alamo didn’t flee. They had the American spirit. They knew that there are things more valuable than life and leisure; and that death and defeat could not measure up to disgrace and dishonor by abandoning hope in the face of our enemies.

This is the testimony of the Americans who died at the Alamo. And Wake Island. And United Airline Flight 93 on 9/11. They weren’t fighting to beat the odds; they were fighting because they refused to abandon the American spirit. At certain times in our history, all Americans have had left to fight with is their refusal – telling our enemies in desperate hours and deadly circumstances that they would not go gently into that good night. And laying down their lives, they knew there was hope because Americans remained. Their respective sacrifices were not the abandonment of hope, but the preservation of it. Those American heroes believed that the battle would be won and invested their lives in that hope. Through the darkness and doubt, hope remains for America.

The American spirit allows us to see our most prominent commercial and military buildings destroyed in acts of terror, killing thousands on our own soil on 9/11. And yet within ninety days our enemies that attacked us were forced to hide and fight in caves in the most remote point on the planet trying to survive the American fury. They had taken their shot at us and won a symbolic victory. But they miscalculated about the mettle of the American spirit, and many of them have paid with their lives, thanks be to God. That spirit of taking the best shot America’s enemies can deliver is what inspired the men at Fort McHenry: burn down our Capital if you can, because in short order we will chase you into the sea and out of America forever. You may give us your best shot but we will still shove it up your ass in due course.

America’s battles have been won because there is a parallel element to the American spirit. This added element to our national character is what brought to mind the second event that I recalled after reading Hanson’s essay. The date I have in mind is April 18, 1942. Just months before the worldwide furies of nationalism and fascism set their sights on America with the intention of taking her down and neutralizing her to end any opposition to their plans of worldwide domination.

The Japanese Empire struck their first blow on December 7, 1941 by raiding Pearl Harbor. Almost 2,500 American servicemen and civilians were killed that day, along with the destruction of most of our Pacific fleet. Almost sixty-five years later, the USS Arizona still lies in Pearl Harbor as a tomb for her crew. But our three aircraft carriers survived, and so did the American spirit. Through the darkness, hope remained.

Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, who planned the assault and led the Japanese forces in the Pearl Harbor attack, was aware of this. Even as his planes returned hailing their decisive victory, Yamamoto warned his staff, "I fear that we have awakened a sleeping giant and filled him with a terrible resolve." As a shrewd commander, he knew the character of his American adversary. Yamamoto knew more about the American spirit than many Americans themselves that dark day. Events like these force us to remember who we are and what we represent to the world.

The attack on Pearl Harbor brought to Americans clarity of vision by exposing the degree of threat posed by their enemies. Much like Hanson observes, it wasn’t just America’s international interests that were being attacked by the fascists Axis Powers – it was the way of American life itself that the enemy was determined to destory. And Americans from every corner of the country and every walk of life rose to fight America’s battle on behalf of the free world. It was not America’s martial might that was released against our enemies; it was the American spirit itself. The country’s resources and industry were dedicated to retaking the initiative from our enemies, and this is precisely what Yamamoto rightly feared. Within months, the engines of American industry were put to the war effort and millions of American warriors were flung to the farthest reaches of the globe to defeat our enemies. Having taken their best shot against America, Yamamoto knew even then at the beginning of the conflict that the American spirit would prevail.

Still bruised and broken from the Pearl Harbor attack, America’s leaders drew deep from the well of our national spirit and approved a plan to take the battle to our enemies and to demonstrate the American resolve to win the war that had been thrust upon us. Less than a month after the attack, a cavalier Army Air Corps Lt. Colonel, Jimmy Doolittle, formulated a strategy to attack the Japanese homeland. The plan, however, was risky and would require that American technology and the flight crews themselves would be pushed to their very limits and beyond. The mission could easily end in total failure and death for all the personnel participating in the raid. One of the three aircraft carriers that had avoided destruction on December 7th would also be put in jeopardy. The B-25s that were used had never been launched from an aircraft carrier, and there was no margin for error as the planes took off. The risks were enormous, but it would be a perfect opportunity to demonstrate to our enemies and to ourselves the American national spirit. In a decision that reflects what is best and true about America, just like George Washington crossing the Delaware, they took the gamble.

The stakes were raised even higher on April 18, 1942 when the carrier bearing the sixteen B-25B bombers was spotted by a Japanese ship. One day and 200 miles away from their scheduled launching point, Doolittle decided to launch the attack. Flying 650 miles in single-file formation at wave top altitude, the American bombers reached the Japanese coast. In broad daylight, Americans were able to bomb the Japanese cities of Yokohama, Kobe, Osaka, Nagoya and the imperial city of Tokyo.

To any other country, such a raid would have been seen as foolish, unnecessarily risky and a likely failure. But as American bombs rained down on the Japanese that day, just weeks after suffering a stinging defeat at Pearl Harbor, America was delivering an unmistakable message to its enemies: we will bring the war home to you. That’s the American way.

Bombing Tokyo wasn’t a symbolic victory for America; it was a foretaste for the Japanese people of the fury that was to follow. Jimmy Doolittle and his raiders weren’t out to inflict revenge; they came as harbingers of reckoning. Taking the battle to our enemies is what Americans do. While the French national motto since the time of Napoleon has been, “Je me rends” (I surrender), the American national motto since our struggle for first freedom and independence has been, “Don’t Tread On Me!” The Japanese Empire learned first-hand that attacking America has fatal consequences. Strike us and we will apply our greatest minds to find ways to unlock even nature’s deepest secrets, as we did with the atomic bomb, to rain fire and death upon you.

The Doolittle Raid is a consummate example of the second element of the American spirit. Yes, Americans can take the worst blows that our enemies have to offer, just like we did at Fort McHenry. It is something we remember and celebrate. But our enemies who dare to tread on us should remember that in the end, we will bring the battle home to you.

This was the message we delivered to the world after 9/11 when we forcibly deposed the Taliban Islamic theocracy in Afghanistan and Saddam’s Baathist thugocracy in Iraq. Our enemies should recall that what the Soviet Union was not able to accomplish in ten years in Afghanistan, the United States of America pulled off in the matter of weeks. In Iraq, our military strategists developed and our soldiers executed a plan that left the largest Arab army in the world no other option than to go home rather than fight the invading American foe in open battle. It seems they learned from our American military’s last visit to the region. For that reason alone it was appropriate for President Bush and the entire country to greet the returning sailors of the USS Abraham Lincoln and the soldiers who fought their way to Baghdad with the words, “Mission Accomplished!”

Yes, some of America’s fighting men and women lost their lives in the rush to Baghdad and Kabul. Some are still the targets and victims of terrorists and cowardly murderers today. Flag-draped coffins are the awful price we pay for our freedoms, but it has always been a price that Americans have been willing to pay. Each one of our war dead is an irreplaceable loss; but they are not irreplaceable because they were young or left families behind. They were irreplaceable because they were Americans willing to fight America’s battles. What better memorial to the American spirit do we have than these men and women who have made the ultimate sacrifice to take the battle to our enemies?

As we are in a period of doubt regarding the progress of the Global War on Terror, we would do well to remember that America has always been plagued by cranks and cowards – those faithless souls whose iniquity in not losing faith in America, but losing faith in themselves as Americans. Regardless, we should never lose our faith. Even when Congress was considering the recognition of The Star-Spangled Banner in the early 20th Century, there were voices calling our great national anthem a “hymn of hate”. The summer soldiers and the sunshine patriots are always with us, whether they are retired armchair generals or craven moonbat politicians, singing their siren songs enticing us to crash upon the rocks of self-doubt, retreat and inaction. For our own sake, we should stay the course and steer clear of those waters.

America’s enemies should not take any comfort at what the cranks and cowards have to say. Islamists should remember the fate of their predecessors, the Fascists and the Communists, who were swept up into the waste bin of history by Americans. The sunshine patriots could be heard back then, too. And Iranians should remember that no matter how far they develop their nuclear capability that we have some old scores to settle with them as well. Jimmy Carter is no longer President and Iran has a blood debt still left to pay from attacks on Americans from Beirut to the Khobar Towers – and America has every intention of collecting on that debt. We always remember the wounds inflicted by our enemies and will repay at the hour of our own choosing.

The American spirit resides deep within our national soul: moral reckoning is our inspiration and war is in our life-blood. Americans should not ever doubt that the rest of the world marvels at our restraint, even though our enemies mistake our restraint for weakness – a mistake they make at their own peril. It is an everlasting testament to the rightness of America’s cause that at the height of our military power at the end of World War Two in sole possession of the most awesome weapon of destruction ever created by mankind that Americans didn’t blink when we disbanded our armies and sent the American legions home to live and work in peace. As former Secretary of State Colin Powell has said, when America has fought its wars on foreign soil, all America has ever asked for is enough land to bury our dead. The long list of countries that have had their freedom secured through American military might over the past two centuries should shame our loudest international critics and quiet our domestic sunshine patriots. Honest historians will never chronicle the story of an American Empire.

We must keep in our hearts daily the American soldiers, marines, sailors and airmen living in harm’s way all over the world. They fly the skies in Afghanistan; they patrol the deadly streets of Iraq; they keep in the peace in the Balkans; they sail the Taiwan Straits; they man the line along the 38th Parallel on the Korean Peninsula. America doesn’t have the largest army in the world or the largest navy. From the beginning America has known that it is not strength of arms alone that will secure victory; the America warrior and the heart that beats within him is why we will win the war against terror. And the American warrior is guided by the American national spirit. In war, America is protecting of the innocent; generous to our friends and allies; and merciless to our enemies. As long as there are Americans left to fight our battles, our enemies should tremble in fear.

For two-hundred and thirty years, this has been the essence of the American national spirit and the heart of American war policy: we will take your best shot and we will bring the battle home to you. I thank Victor Davis Hanson for reminding me of it. In this time of uncertainty and doubt about the progress of the Global War on Terror, it is something that both we and our enemies should remember.

Sunday, April 16, 2006

Athanasius: On the Incarnation

Christ is risen! He has risen indeed!

One of my personal traditions each year on Easter Sunday is to read Athanasius' classic work, On the Incarnation. Seventeen hundred years later, it is still one of the best expositions of the Christian faith. A work on the Incarnation might seem more appropriate reading for Christmas or Epiphany, but it is the chapter on the Resurrection (Chap. 5) that has always particularly stirred my soul. And yet, every page of my copy is highlighted along with my margin notes. This is good meat for food (Heb. 5:14). So I encourage you, much like the angel told the Apostle John in the Revelation, take this book and eat.

The section that stirs me the most is section 27:

A very strong proof of this destruction of death and its conquest by the cross is supplied by a present fact, namely this. All the disciples of Christ despise death; they take the offensive against it and, instead of fearing it, by the sign of the cross and by faith in Christ trample on it as on something dead. Before the divine sojourn of the Savior, even the holiest of men were afraid of death, and mourned the dead as those who perish. But now that the Savior has raised His body, death is no longer terrible, but all those who believe in Christ tread it underfoot as nothing, and prefer to die rather than to deny their faith in Christ, knowing full well that when they die they do not perish, but live indeed, and become incorruptible through the resurrection. But that devil who of old wickedly exulted in death, now that the pains of death are loosed, he alone it is who remains truly dead. There is proof of this too; for men who, before they believe in Christ, think death horrible and are afraid of it, once they are converted despise it so completely that they go eagerly to meet it, and themselves become witnesses of the Savior's resurrection from it. Even children hasten thus to die, and not men only, but women train themselves by bodily discipline to meet it. So weak has death become that even women, who used to be taken in by it, mock at it now as a dead thing robbed of all its strength. Death has become like a tyrant who has been completely conquered by the legitimate monarch; bound hand and foot the passers-by sneer at him, hitting him and abusing him, no longer afraid of his cruelty and rage, because of the king who has conquered him. So has death been conquered and branded for what it is by the Savior on the cross. It is bound hand and foot, all who are in Christ trample it as they pass and as witnesses to Him deride it, scoffing and saying, "O Death, where is thy victory? O Grave, where is thy sting? (1 Cor. 15:55)

These are excellent words for us to dwell on as we celebrate today, as do all Christians around the world, the testimony of the two angels at Christ's empty tomb on that first Easter morning when they announced to the amazement of the disciples, "He is not here, but is risen!" (Luke 24:6). This is surely the loadstone of the Christian faith.

So I write in these early hours as first light is soon to break as it did that blessed ancient morn, that we may greet one another today with that same angelic greeting proclaiming to each other the glad and triumphant tidings that Christ has conquered Death for us that we may mock and jeer at it still this Easter Day.

Christ is risen! He is risen indeed!

(Thanks to Pooh for the link. Read his own thoughts on Athanasius. We didn't coordinate our same-themed posts. Honestly.)

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Rome Getting It Right on Islam

Two weeks ago I posted on Pope Benedict's leadership in Rehabilitating the Crusades. Just a few days after that post was written, Benedict met with his cardinals. As Italian journalist and scholar Sandro Magister of Chiesa notes, one of the four topics under discussion during their day of "prayer and reflection" of the consistory was Islam. Benedict also played an instrumental role in the release of Afghan Christian convert Abdul Rahman from custody and his subsequent asylum in Italy.

Magister also cites a recent article in the Italian Catholic journal, Stadium, entitled "The Islamic Question". The article is authored by two prominent Catholic scholars, Roberto A.M. Bertacchini and Piersandro Vanzan. Vanzan is a Jesuit professor and a contributor to the La Civiltà Cattolica Roman Jesuit magazine that has each issue approved directly by the Vatican. These are no mere independent Catholic academics; they are writing on behalf of the Church of Rome.

In their extensive article (only portions of which are available on the Chiesa site), Bertacchini and Vanzan identify six trends of the Islamization of the West:

1) The attacks against Western interests from Morocco to the Philippines;

2) The escalation of terrorism in the West (such as 9/11 and the 7/5 London bombings);

3) The rise of anti-Semetic propaganda (something Islam picked up from Enlightenment Europe; I'll write on that later);

4) Outright missionary activity by Muslims in the West;

5) Immigration;

6) The public expressions of elation by Muslims at the misfortunes of the West, such as Hurricane Katrina.
The authors make three additional points worth mentioning here:


1) The shift in Islamist thinking from "modernizing Islam" to "Islamizing modernity", which was a policy that came about in the dispute between Osama bin Laden's mentor and founder of al-Qaeda, Abdullah Azza, and the man who would eventually become bin Laden's right-hand man, Ayman al-Zawahiri. Zawahiri had Azzam assassinated, which allowed the "Islamizing modernity" position to dominate Islamist discourse.

2) The utterly inability for self-criticism in Islam (see David Pryce-Jones' book, The Closed Circle, for the cultural implications of this factor).

3) The incompatibility of the Islamic ideology and system with notions of individuality and personal freedom. They note that there was no word for "freedom" in the Arabic language for more than a thousand years after the founding of Islam; and the word used for it today, "hurriyya", means "entitlement", as if freedoms come by grant (of the sultan or the caliph).
Many Roman Catholic countries in the West (primarily in Europe, but also in Latin America) are facing the immediate threat of Islamization. Pope Benedict, unlike his predecessor, is right to express his concern and openly identifying this threat. He is actively promoting a dialogue and a policy shift regarding Islam as radical as the shift made within Islamist circles itself with the rise of Zawahiri's ideological position.

As I've said before, no one will ever confuse me with an apologist for the Church of Rome, but the rising threat from Islam should convince us of the maxim established by our American Founding Fathers that if we don't hang together in this battle, we shall surely all hang separately. Secularists have neither the cultural tools nor the ability of vision to defeat this threat. The response to the Islamist challenge must come from within Christendom itself. Regardless of the significant religious differences between Protestant, Roman Catholic and Orthodox (distincitions that should not be glossed over), we must understand that nothing less than the existence of Christianity itself is presently at stake. Mutual cooperation between the respective branches of the Christian faith is imperative.

Friday, April 07, 2006

Hayden Run Falls (Springtime)


It has been a while since I posted a picture, so now that Spring has arrived in Central Ohio, let me share with you a local photo. This is Hayden Run Falls, taken May 2005. I spent a lot of time here growing up. What is remarkable about this scene is that there is a busy intersection just yards away from the cliff top, but when you're down by the falls, you can't hear the traffic. When it rains heavily, you can feel the moisture well before the falls are in view. Sadly, some idiots have marked up the area with graffiti, which I have been able to angle out of view. This is one of the richest areas in North America for finding fossils. Invariably, someone will get hurt or killed scaling the cliff walls this Spring.I have some fantastic winter scenes of the falls with ice hanging off all the trees that I'll post sometime. Enjoy! Posted by Picasa

Monday, April 03, 2006

Hometown Jihad

Be sure to check out my article which leads today's edition of FrontPage Magazine, Hometown Jihad.

View reader comments/hate mail on the article at Go Postal!

UPDATE: A shout-out to my people in Denmark covering my article: MINUT: FRI KONSERVATIV. Goddag! Det glæder mig at træffe Dem!

UPDATE #2: Thanks to JihadWatch for the plug as well.

Saturday, April 01, 2006

Conversion, Apostasy, and the "Religion of Peace"

The news last weekend about the Afghan Christian facing the death penalty for converting from Islam is illustrative of the dilemma and the threat we face in the West (and those of us who are Christians anywhere in the world) from the rapidly spreading institutionalization of Islam.

One Christian Science Monitor article I read earlier this week, Conversion a thorny issue in Muslim world, (which LGF rightly termed the “Comically Understated Headline of the Day”), discusses the difficultly of the “Just Give Them Democracy” foreign policy position of the Bush Administration:

The issue of religious freedoms in one in which, as in Afghanistan, modern laws are clashing with ancient traditions. Rahman’s case illustrates a glaring contradiction between Afghanistan’s constitution, which upholds the right to freedom of religion on one hand but enshrines the supremacy of sharia law on the other.
The ideological presupposition of Islam in the Muslim world effectively neuters any attempt to structure any liberal-style democracy. The historic example of the “secular” government of Turkey should have convinced us of the folly of that position. We see it repeated today in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and looming large in Iraq.

When it comes to discussing liberal democracy with Muslims, it is imperative to first define terms, because we regularly use similar language with profoundly different meanings. Presuppositions matter. I was reminded of this over the weekend while I was reading Youssef Choueiri’s book, Islamic Fundamentalism, where he qualifies what is meant by modern Muslims when they talk about “there is no compulsion in religion”:

Jihad is then the continuation of God’s politics by other means. It is an obligation that becomes incumbent on the believers whenever the tenets and legal rules are violated or neglected. In this sense, jihad is a form of political struggle designed, as Qutb argues, to disarm the enemy so that Islam is allowed to apply its shari’a unhindered by the oppressive power of idolatrous tyrannies. By the mere removal of the political obstacle, the central aim of revolutionary struggle is accomplished, a fact which refutes the charge of forcible conversion. This is, for example, the correct meaning of the Qur’anic statement: ‘there is no compulsion in religion’. Contrary to the opinion of liberal-minded Muslims, this Qur’anic verse, Qutb explains, presupposes the hegemony of Islam in society, thereby freeing individuals from the political domination of non-Muslim rulers. Once political power is in the hands of the new Islamic elite, and its divine laws are firmly established, the subjects of the state are given the choice either to embrace Islam or persist in practicing their inherited religions and beliefs. However, this tolerance is a conditional agreement concluded between a victorious party and vanquished subjects. (Youssef M. Choueiri, Islamic Fundamentalism, pp. 136-137)

As Choueiri shows, when Muslim ideologues like Sayyid Qutb, one of the most influential Islamist ideologues, talk about the absence of compulsion in religion in Islam, they assume the absolute cultural, political and religious domination of Islam in a society. This presumption of Islamic hegemony should be remembered not only when we talk about apostasy in Islam, but overall freedom of religion for non-Muslims.

But while there is a pretended “freedom” from religious compulsion for non-Muslims, there is no such provision for Muslims themselves. Much like the Mafia, once you are in you are considered in for life. As Abul A’la Mawdudi, perhaps the most widely published and read Islamic thinker of the 20th Century, states in his authoritative treatise, The Punishment of the Apostate According to Islamic Law:

"There is no compulsion in religion" (la ikraha fi'd din: Qur'an 2:256) means that we do not compel anyone to come into our religion. And this is truly our practice. But we initially warn whoever would come and go back that this door is not open to come and go. Therefore anyone who comes should decide before coming that there is no going back.

This issue of freedom of conscience for Muslims has been recently illustrated in Algeria, where the parliament in recent weeks approved a law banning all non-Islamic religions from offering calls to conversion. As this Arabic News report explains, the punishment for violating the law is two to five years imprisonment and 5,000-10,000 EURO fine.

But before non-Muslims breathe a sigh of relief at the exemption from Islamic laws of apostasy, we should remember the treatment – extending from the time of initial Muslim conquests and continuing until today – of countless Christians who have paid for their lives for refusing to convert to Islam. A notable historical example is the 9th Century A.D. Martyrs of Cordoba, Spain. Their history was recorded by one priest, Eulogius, who was also eventually martyred for his Christian faith after being convicted of proselytizing. In the span of nine years, more than 48 Christians were beheaded or impaled in this small Iberian town for refusing to convert to Islam. In one horrible case in 864, a nun was thrown into a cauldron of molten lead.

While punishments for apostasy, and the notion of apostasy itself, having long since disappeared from the West, recent events should tell us that the issue is still an issue that warrants attention. Most Muslim countries are signatories to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which provides for (Article 18) for freedom to change one’s religious belief. But as noted “apostate” Ibn Warraq notes in his short survey of international law and Islamic practice, Apostasy and Human Rights, many attempts have been made to rewrite or gut the freedom of religious choice clause by the block of Islamic nations. He cites one expert, Elisabeth Mayer, who says:

“The lack of support for the principle of freedom of religion in the Islamic human rights schemes is one of the factors that most sharply distinguishes them from the International Bill of Human Rights, which treats freedom of religion as an unqualified right. The [Muslim] authors’ unwillingness to repudiate the rule that a person should be executed over a question of religious belief reveals the enormous gap that exists between their mentalities and the modern philosophy of human rights.”

I have to admit that it is sad to think that there are American soldiers still dying in Afghanistan to protect the very government that was pushing for the death penalty against this Christian man. We shouldn't fool ourselves that this incident is irrelevant to those of us in the West. Failing to understand the historic and religious context of religious freedom – or more precisely, the lack of it – in Islam, and the spreading institutionalization of Islam, could prove fatal to future generations in the Christian West.